03 May 2013

The Import of Sport

And so, in the final hours of my time in Port Elizabeth, this is what we find.
My last visit to South Africa was thematically inseparable from the global sporting spectacle that was attracting the attention of billions of humanoids and psychic cephalopods worldwide.  This time around, there is no World Cup to dominate and occupy conversations, newspaper column-inches, online photo galleries, twitter feeds, and waking nightmares.  That being said, it find it odd how various sports seem to form a metronomic foundation of my life on the road around the southern tip of Africa.

Like Sands Through the Hourglass

While everyone else here has to work and toil and do all of those sorts of things that people do to make ends meet, I’ve been drifting through the African scenescape like some sort of diaphanous transient.  It’s very easy to lose track to the days of the week when the only real milestones are the previous and the next flights.  That’s where UEFA comes in.  I just need to think back to the last match that I watched, since all UEFA competitions are broadcast everywhere, and I can navigate my way through the murky temporal waters that way.  Only one German team has qualified for the Champions’ League Final?  It must be Wednesday.  Barcelona just been humiliated for the second time on the trot?  Thursday.  Fernando Torres scored a goal last night?  Friday.

I am Ozymandias, King of (the Sport of) Kings

Horse racing form books are filled with a nigh-hieroglyphic set of condensed information.  It took me a while to reckon up what all of the numbers, letters, and symbols represent, and what meaning they hold in relation to one another.  Eventually, these little discrete crumbs of data form elaborate mosaics of pixelated reference points, like a Magic Eye picture.  Adjusting your perspective so that those virtual pixels can be seen in the context of a larger graphic narrative gives a series of patterns and trends that can be used to predict the outcome of each race.
Twenty-to-one odds?  No big deal.

So I’ve got a working hypothesis that allowed me to pick the winners of two races from three.  I didn’t even try with one because the data set was scrawny and the field was inordinately skewed upon first inspection.  So I made a bit of money, and earned dark, vile stares from everyone in the bookie’s parlour.  There were an awful lot of aging and bitter blokes hiding behind ramparts of cigarette butts and conjuring permutations of inordinate proportions that might possibly turn six rand into ten.  I just pick the winners and take the money.

I’ll be just like Buddy Holly

I always liked cricket a bit.  The fifth Doctor wore a cricket get-up most of the time.  Of course, he also had that celery thing going, presumably so that he’d be prepared for any Bloody Marys that came his way down the pub.  That being said, I rarely had the time or the patience to watch a five-day test match in its entirety, or even keep track of the proceedings using whatever media coverage was available.  I essentially knew the rules, watched a few extended lengths of the stuff when at John’s pub in Blantyre, and could even drop the odd name, like Brian Lara or Shane Warne.
Then I discovered the wonder and the glory that is T20 cricket.  My oath.  It’s gripping stuff.  It’s like concentrated cricket highlights pumped full of electric juju and fired from an orbital ion cannon.  If anyone knows what that drug-rehab recreational activity known as baseball is, this is like telling each team that they get 120 pitches at the other team, and that one team’s batting order goes through before the other does.  No alternating innings or any of that rubbish.  Every thrown ball counts for something, and no movement is extraneous. 
Just this week, a lad named Chris Gayle shattered a cricket record that now seems likely to remain shattered for any time in the foreseeable future.  He smashed 100 runs out of 30 balls thrown at him.  The baseball equivalent would be mind-liquifying.  American stattos get all moist when they think about batters with a season average of 0.400 or over.  Well, imagine if the average wasn’t per at-bat, but per pitch, and then imagine someone that belts the ball out of the park 70% of the time, and you might start to understand.
The big T20 cricket league is (unsurprisingly) in India, and it’s a big production.  There are terribly fit cheerleaders, a stadium DJ spinning tunes, fireworks, mega-jumbotron graphic displays, internationally-renowned commentators, several different hats analogous to the Tour de France peloton, television advertising timeouts, fanatical stadium-packing crowds, and bonkers corporate sponsorships.  To my amazement, it works.  NFL games are a bunch of potty-breaks and naptimes interrupted by the odd 2-yard run play.  People at baseball games long for the seventh-inning stretch to break the monotony of watching pitchers throw to first base idly between conferences on the mound.   NBA fans have long ago forgotten what “travelling” is, and are so jaded that slam dunks receive as much attention as the colour of the popcorn vendors’ socks.
Cricket manages to incorporate the chess-like strategies and machinations of the NFL with the pop of an unexpected superstar highlight-reel bit of action, as well as some beautifully orchestrated teamwork and coordination.  It just took me a while to find a format of cricket that really brings all of those elements to the fore and distills them to their essence.
I would recommend that all sports fans check out some of the action here:  http://www.iplt20.com/
I’ve been fortunate to see matches every afternoon for the past week, and they’re always entertaining, particularly for a neutral.  If this sport ever makes it big in North America, I’ve got dibs on being the hipster who liked it before it was cool.
More news as it becomes available.
Cheers and good night England and the colonies.
—mARKUS

No comments:

Blog Archive

Followers